by Sathish Govind
Malaysia’s current parliamentary democracy, while embodying numerous strengths, is not without its challenges — a reality faced by many other nations as well.
The system empowers individuals to vote for their preferred candidate or party during elections, granting them representation in Parliament. However, the democratic process largely halts at this stage.
This raises a critical question: what mechanisms ensure that elected Members of Parliament genuinely champion the aspirations of their constituents?
Moreover, what safeguards are in place to prevent them from neglecting the needs of their electorate?
A closer examination of parliamentary debates reveals a significant disconnect between the topics discussed and the realities faced by the public. Often, issues raised appear to serve as platforms for settling scores among parliamentarians rather than addressing the pressing concerns of the nation.
Furthermore, Members of Parliament have to serve their constituents by regularly visiting their constituencies and ensuring the needs of the people are adequately addressed.
While the core responsibility of being a Member of Parliament is to serve the people, the reality often falls short. Beneath the rhetoric of “serving the rakyat,” the service records of a number of MPs leave much to be desired.
The current system requires adjustments, as it is no longer entirely suitable for today’s needs. A “People’s Parliament” offers a potential solution.
While there are numerous definitions and interpretations of such a system, its essence lies in empowering ordinary Malaysians to hold leaders accountable and ensuring that decisions genuinely reflect the aspirations of the people.
This transformation is fundamentally about raising the level of accountability of those in power and improving the overall political and economic landscape of the land.
As a starting point, each constituency could establish an assembly of representatives elected from individual districts or resident associations. This could ensure that Members of Parliament effectively convey the grievances of the people in Parliament and raise national issues that truly matter.
Moreover, a system that requires MPs to regularly meet with their constituents and explain the rationale behind proposed legislation in Parliament would bring about greater transparency and accountability.
Such a system would also enable MPs to address pressing issues that impact the people, such as the rising cost of living, and actively seek feedback from residents.
With vigilant constituents monitoring the performance of their elected representatives, taxpayers’ money would be better safeguarded, ensuring it is not wasted on MPs who merely occupy their seats without truly serving the public. This would deter lip service and promote genuine public service.
Additionally, funds allocated to representatives would be more transparent and accountable, ensuring they are used effectively for designated purposes within their constituencies.
(The views expressed here are those of the writer, a seasoned business journalist)
WE