by Rahim Said
In the intricate dance of mixed marriages, where love knows no cultural boundaries, a symphony of sad and comical outcomes often plays out, orchestrated by policies that sometimes defy logic.
Take David, for instance, whose lineage reflects a kaleidoscope of Indian and Chinese heritage. Despite inheriting his mother’s Chinese features and fair complexion, his identity card brands him as purely Indian.
The irony unfolds further as his own children, with unmistakably Chinese appearances, are likewise labeled as Indians, leaving us to ponder the perplexities of bureaucratic classification.
In another chapter of this mixed marriage saga, a Malay gentleman marries a Chinese woman from Penang. Their daughters, excelling in Chinese schools, find themselves on a peculiar detour when it comes to university scholarships. Despite academic excellence that would make any parent proud, the elusive opportunity to study in Singapore slips through their fingers.
The father, articulating the frustration in his own words, unveils a disheartening reality. His daughter, Freida, a trailblazer as the first Malay student in a premier Chinese secondary school in Penang, faced a cruel twist of fate. Despite outshining her peers with stellar results, the opportunity to study in Singapore was denied. The reason? A label that should never have mattered – her father’s ethnicity.
The bitter irony is laid bare – a system that claims to reward meritocracy succumbs to the insidious influence of identity politics. The Education Ministry’s decision, seemingly rooted in archaic prejudices, overlooks talent and hard work in favour of ethnic profiling.
In this theatre of mixed marriages, where love is blind but society insists on squinting through a lens of categorisations, the outcomes are both lamentable and ludicrous. As David jests about the census tussle, one can’t help but wonder if the officials determining scholarship eligibility are just as bewildered by the complexities of mixed heritage.
In the end, the story of mixed marriages becomes a cautionary tale, urging society and policymakers to reconsider the consequences of policies that define one’s future based on arbitrary classifications.
Until then, the symphony plays on, blending notes of irony and tragedy in the lives of those caught in the crossfire of love and bureaucracy.
Rahim Said is a human behaviourist, professional management consultant, corporate trainer and executive coach specialising in coaching of senior executives and individual entrepreneurs with the purpose of modifying their behaviour in the pursuit of their cherished missions.
The views expressed here are that of the writer’s and not necessarily that of Weekly Echo’s.